Airship strafe

Comments: 36

Oldest • Newest • Most likes • Fewest likes

• Add a comment
• 09 May, '24
  Boff Merged

  Highlighted comment
  
  Basically allow side to side strafing, so one can circle strafe towers and bases when looking for a way in or better angle to dock.

  3 Copy link to this comment
• 17 Apr, '24
  draughtman

  This doesn't really need implementing...players should really learn to fly better....
  In any case, players have a boarding plank to solve any problem

  10 Copy link to this comment
• 17 Apr, '24
  Pach

  I agree with draughtman, but for a different reason: it's complete immersion breaking.
  
  Airships cannot move sideways: the drag would be too great. That's why the engines point in one direction. They turn by turning reducing (or reversing) one engine.
  
  The game currently has a pretty "real" feel for how the controls work. Strafing sideways would kill that realistic feel pretty quick for me.

  11 Copy link to this comment
• 23 Apr, '24
  ChrisP

  I don't agree - ships (ferries) have a real world strafing mechanism for slow speeds

  13 Copy link to this comment
• 23 Apr, '24
  MKGDX

  Being able to strafe would be incredibly useful from the get-go, but when your ship grows large enough that you can't tell where your pivot is? It'd be amazing and make delicate manuevers less of a hassle.

  8 Copy link to this comment
• 23 Apr, '24
  Yanphi

  If it's too immersion-breaking adding it from the get-go, maybe make it possible as a potential upgrade item?
  
  Like engine-side jets or directional air thrusters we can place on the side of the ship?

  19 Copy link to this comment
• 23 Apr, '24
  gumby

  Advanced airships can use thrusting maneuvers via either specifically designed and integrated thrusters or multidirectional engines. It should be an upgrade Item and it should be upgradeable. The main issue is that the lack of physics being applied to the airship.

  10 Copy link to this comment
• 24 Apr, '24
  Ruby

  For some reason I'm unable to upvote, please add a vote for me. The page just highlights the button when I click it.
  
  I'm terrible at parallel parking the airship. Side thrusters would be a huge quality of life improvement. Even with the Docking Plank there are situations where having the ability to slide a little bit left or right would be really useful.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 24 Apr, '24
  Imahilus

  Whoever has an issue with immersion; bear in mind that:
  1. We can reverse with jet-engines
  2. The jet engines work the same with 4 different fuel-types (of which I doubt helium and crystal are combustible in the first place)
  3. The engines and turbines have a tiny attachment point that would suffer ludicrous sheer forces, yet remain attached without a bother
  
  So a strafing engine makes as much sense as what we have already, in my humble opinion

  15 Copy link to this comment
• 02 May, '24
  Rider of Dark

  To add to point 1: We can reverse with jet engines at maximum speed.

  3 Copy link to this comment
• 09 May, '24
  Greg | Community Manager Admin Merged

  Read the rules please. Only post if there isnt already a card that exists for your request

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 09 May, '24
  Greg | Community Manager System

  "Additional lateral thruster or Gimbled thruster upgrade" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-05-09), including upvotes (1) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 27 Jun, '24
  LunaticNeko

  I just think this would allow creative maneuvering techniques to be used. The game is far from reality enough that we might be able to try it.

  Copy link to this comment
• 12 Jul, '24
  Tor Merged

  when you have to move the air ship around, if i am over a landing platform and i see i have to more to the left. Then i have to do this hole back and forth dance, a thruster on bothe sides so i can push it a bit would be great.

  Copy link to this comment
• 12 Jul, '24
  HiddenKey

  This could also add a new "strafe thruster" item, adding complexity to the game. Players who don't like the idea just don't research it?

  Copy link to this comment
• 15 Jul, '24
  Greg | Community Manager System

  "thrusters" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-07-12), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

  2 Copy link to this comment
• 02 Sep, '24
  WJS Merged

  I can't think of any good reason not to have them. The only reason I've heard is that historical airships didn't, but setting aside that we have a *lot* of things that historical airships didn't, they dropped lines to men on the ground who would guide them in to land precisely. Therefore they didn't *need* that kind of manoeuvrability. We don't have this, so we do.

  Copy link to this comment
• 11 Sep, '24
  Jayim Duinara

  If you are worried about realism, then make maneuvering thrusters an upgrade that only work if the ship is below a certain amount of forward/backward thrust (i.e. you can only strafe as a parking aid, the ship needs to be moving less than 15/10/5 km/h to work).
  
  Frankly, I think this would be one of the acceptable breaks from reality for the medium; PLEASE, let us maneuver easier!

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 13 Oct, '24
  13th Merged

  The ability to move the balloon to the left / right without turning it in this direction is very lacking. Perhaps you will add some maneuvering engines that will have to be installed on the sides of the balloon, which would provide such an opportunity.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 20 Oct, '24
  FFH kets System

  "Add maneuvering engines that would make it possible to move the balloon left/right without turning" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-10-13), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 26 Jan, '25
  InfectedRonin Merged

  So basically:
  
  https://forever-skies.featureupvote.com/suggestions/543145/airship-strafe

  Copy link to this comment
• 11 Feb, '25
  TechnoBear

  This would make piloting very large airships like mine, a little less agonizing.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 07 Mar, '25
  Radix Salvilines

  Is this really still under consideration?

  Copy link to this comment
• 09 Mar, '25
  M@riner

  we need a Sidewinder-Upgrade, as it exists in big ozean transport ships

  Copy link to this comment
• 10 Mar, '25
  Novathorn

  If 230K ton cruise ships and actual blimps can move sideways its not immersion braking. it should be slow sure but I think possible. we should also have to fuel a generator for the airship to keep things like refrigerators, lights, ect running.

  1 Copy link to this comment
• 25 Apr, '25
  Mateo123ABCD

  I think it would make sense to add strafing just by putting a sideways facing engine and putting a low speed cap on it, but I also think that it’s easy to get around so other things should be prioritized first.

  Copy link to this comment
• 25 Apr, '25
  DCI Benway

  Voted up. Endlessly frustrating trying to maneuver ship around to scan Murals for example. Strafe would help greatly.

  Copy link to this comment
• 02 Jun, '25
  Vigi

  if its done via a seperate engine you install that provides some really tiny strafe for inching towards something then sure otherwise its just not how a blimp would work

  Copy link to this comment
• 03 Jun, '25
  darkdragonmage376

  On a FFG, it used to use two small torpedo shaped turbines, that could be turned left to right, so that you can maneuver the ship itself, right up to the dock. (Max speed: 5 knots.)
  So one idea, a small engine that lets you inch side to side, or even a blimp-that-has an inbuilt strafe option. Kinda like how the Flat-Balloon is an option... Have a Strafe-Balloon. (for those that want or need it.)

  Copy link to this comment
• 05 Jun, '25
  Greg | Community Manager System

  "Lateral thrusters" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2024-09-02), including upvotes (62) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 26 Jun, '25
  Terror Bunny

  An alternative to this might be adding a small landing craft that could dock with the airship and a wrecked one could be found at one of the later sites and require an upgraded engine and turbine to research, or build. (Maybe even add a Wrecked Docking Bay to the crashed airship in the Underdust Suburbs.) It could consist of three rooms and a cockpit, an included engine and turbines, a basic fabricator and a single storage box. Maybe put in a restriction that it must stay within x distance of the main ship.

  Copy link to this comment
• 15 Oct, '25
  Ivanark Merged

  .
  The mounted extractor has a very short range. Like, a 'why did I even bother' short range. This thing is big, it should have some serious reach.
  
  Additionally, ships that can hover can usually move sideways. Airship needs strafe controls.
  
  It also needs a 3rd persol veiw or at least some 'docking' cameras.
  
  Lastly, there are surfaces that won't support the player. I landed / used my draw bridge to climb on a building, went right though it, and the game stole all my stuff because I 'died' from passing through environment.

  Copy link to this comment
• 15 Oct, '25
  Greg | Community Manager Admin Merged

  Please please check existing suggestions before making new ones!!!!

  Copy link to this comment
• 15 Oct, '25
  Greg | Community Manager System

  "Need sideways airship movement, mounted extractor range" (suggested by <Hidden> on 2025-10-15), including upvotes (1) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.

  Copy link to this comment
• 01 Dec, '25
  Ablewind

  Perhaps something as simple as the "Orientation" or "Direction" that an engine is placed will determine how much or little "strafe" capability a given Air Ship will have?
  
  This will allow for players to customize their individual ships' mobility to their own liking?
  
  Perhaps different orientations will also allow for tighter/faster turning?
  
  This would allow for deeper player consideration on how they design their ships as well as present the possibility of having to consider additional weight costs when adding on multiple additional engines for such mobility.
  
  There IS the possibility of incorporating/including the turbines as possible agents for "mobility" if they are allowed to be mounted Vertically and in pairs that face in the same or opposite direction of each other or at right angles to each other for possible strafing and tighter/faster turning/rotation.
  
  Granted, I am not about to pretend to know how easy or challenging such game coding would be.

  Copy link to this comment
• 05 Dec, '25
  Justin

  Strafing would be nice to have, and it could be an upgrade, perhaps via turning engines or side thrusters you attach. That way you learn to fly the normal way, then you get the strafe engine upgrade, and it makes flying more convenient.

  Copy link to this comment